Senior SEO Consultant

Share
  • 0
  • 0

In December 2020, around the 15th, Pornhub (a MindGeek company) removed millions of videos from their website – slashing the amount of available content considerably.

Not for SEO reasons, but for legal reasons. You can read more about why here.

For most websites, drastically reducing the amount of content available (due to the verification of the uploading user) would be catastrophic. That being said, studies have shown that pruning content intelligently can yield positive impacts for websites.

So, almost one month later, I’m going to dig into the data available and try to answer the question: Did removing 80% of its content hurt Pornhub.com?

Warning: Needless to say, this article is going to include words related to the adult industry, so I’d advise discretion.

It’s also fair to say, we need to make some caveats:

  • This is using third-party tools, so it’s as objective as you can get without having access to actual data.
  • There’s no way to tell (without data access) that all the original videos were indexed by Google and driving traffic. However, at present there are 25-mil+ videos indexed across all of pornhub.com when performing a site: search, so we can assume a fairly good % of these drove at least some traffic.
  • For the data analysis, I’m looking at *www.pornhub.com/* (English), and the US market.

The Scale Of The Removal

First of all, let’s explore the scale of the removal. 80% is a big percentage, but 80% of 100 isn’t as bad as 80% of 10,000,000.

Using a combination of WayBack Machine and the live website (at the time of publishing), I estimate that PornHub has removed ~10,821,268 videos (13,751,395 down to 2,954,127) across 196 top-level porn categories.

Third-Party Keyword Data

So, let’s take a look at third-party keyword data and the trends from the start of December 2020 to now.

Pornhub estimated keyword rankings (all URLs)

On a very top level, January 2021 is currently down in terms of total keywords versus December 2020. That being said, in wider context November 2020 was the peak for this measure, and January 2021’s figure of 3,138,000 keywords would be one of the higher months recorded since June 2019 – which as you can see by the graph saw a sharp decline.

If we filter the data by just video URLs, the decline is even more visible:

Pornhub estimated keyword rankings, just video URLs

It’s no surprise that removing 80% of your video content really smacks your rankings for content on those URLs, and as a result this tool is reporting the lowest number of keywords for video URLs since 2014.

So what does this say in terms of traffic?

Estimated Pornhub us Video URL Traffic

Again, no surprises that if you reduce the number of ranking keywords, you reduce the estimated traffic based on those keywords.

When you change the date range to just the past year, the drop off becomes even more interesting:

Estimated Pornhub us video URL traffic, last 12 months

Whilst the content was removed in December, aside from a spike in May, estimated traffic has actually been declining month over month since the start of the year.

The May Update

It’s no secret that the May 4th update influenced a lot of niches, and the adult sector was no different.

As the world has evolved, the general attitude towards sex and adult content has changed – a lot. As a result, the increase… tolerance of adult terminology and content within the “mainstream” has meant that a lot of terms previously resigned to the realms of porn now have varied intents.

This is a common trend across the adult industry, as niche players compete with the monolithic tube sites, oftentimes for the same user.

PornHub Category Rankings

Taking the 98 core categories that PornHub have listed on their website (for videos), and tracking [porn] and [porn video] compound keywords over the past month – the lowest current ranking position in the US (mobile) is #5.

PornHub Category + Video Compound Rankings

So on the face of it, rankings are maintaining for the core categories, but reducing content by such a vast amount has had an impact on overall rankings and traffic.

But could this blow have been softened?

What I would Have Done Differently With The Content Removal

Taking ranking video URLs from November (27,727 of them), those that have been disabled/removed for content review still return a 200 status code… But with considerable changes to the page content and meta data.

The video template on PornHub has a relatively standard format:

  • Title tag
  • H1 tag
  • Category labels & links
  • User feedback ratings
  • Comments

On the new template, highlighting that the video has been disabled, the template simply has:

  • Title tag
  • H1

The URL hasn’t changed, and the title tag and H1 are still connected (the same), but now read “Video Disabled”.

For Google accessing the document URL, they’ll just be seeing the same URI path – but with changed content that no longer adds value to the user query, and because it still returns a 200 status code – it’s sank like a stone.

I would have taken a similar approach, but 302 redirected the URL to a holding page returning a 451.

This way, Google (and other search engines) can process the URI reading a temporary redirect to a 451. So that way, if the content passes legal validation the temporary redirect can be removed and business as usual for both the content and URL can be resumed.

I’d then add this URL to an additional XML sitemap, so that as videos are processed and added back to the roster, so their index status can be monitored easily in Google Search Console (as being able to report on this to the wider business will likely satiate questions from C level and non-marketers… e.g. the “How are we doing?” question).

 

Share
  • 0
  • 0